Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Measurement’ Category

During the question-and-answer part of a presentation I gave at the 2010 Library Assessment Conference in Baltimore last week, I couldn’t resist editorializing about how bad convenience sampling is. One audience member spoke up, saying she felt convenience samples are legitimate as long as findings are interpreted as describing only the respondents, themselves. Later on [...]

Read Full Post »

This simple statement is one of several “myths” appearing on GeekTheLibrary: The busier the library, the more money it receives. GeekTheLibrary is concerned that the general public mistakenly believes libraries are funded based on how much they are used by patrons. Perhaps their concern is well founded, I don’t know. But the statement happens also [...]

Read Full Post »

My prior post about the library research report, Opportunity for All, reminded me that as simple as percentages are, they sure can lead into bizarre territory. Suppose the report authors had determined that in 1990 an estimated 200 Internet terminals had been installed in U.S. public libraries nationwide. By 2007, then, the cumulative percentage growth [...]

Read Full Post »

I am still on my excellence-in-graphical-data-presentation kick. Insufferably so, I am afraid. As my Feb. 16 post mentioned, the principles of high quality graphical data presentation have been articulated by William Cleveland, Edward Tufte, Howard Wainer and others. Good graphing practice is based on these three rules: Be clear.  (Strive for clarity. – William Cleveland) [...]

Read Full Post »

There’s a goodly amount of good advice in the book What the Numbers Say: A Field Guide to Mastering Our Numerical World by Derrick Niederman and David Boyum (2003, Broadway Books). The quantity of this advice is sizable, considerable, hefty, copius, substantial, and voluminous. It’s a lot! But I’m more impressed qualitatively. Their message is [...]

Read Full Post »

I have implied this in other entries in this blog, but I might as well say it outright: The library and information science profession needs to come to terms with the issue of standards for (i.e., rules of) evidence for performance, statistical, and advocacy research data. There, now I’ve said it. I recently read the [...]

Read Full Post »

In spite of their evolution over the last few decades, accelerated most recently due to the Googlization of information, public libraries have been amazingly impervious to change in the arena of performance measurement. I found the following observations about  library measures in the early history of American libraries: There is no branch of library economy [...]

Read Full Post »

Readers of the, say, older persuasion may recall a time when children actually enjoyed games that required no peripheral devices, infrared sensors, or satellite tracking. There was one party game, simply called (I think) “Telephone,” where one player whispered a message to the next, and that player to the next, until the message was passed [...]

Read Full Post »

I think I get it now.  I had thought the term assessment meant a systematic and appropriately rigorous measurement of a construct or phenomenon of interest, like program outcomes, community needs, service quality, and so on.  Only now have I come to understand that a self-assessment is a different animal altogether. Who would have thought [...]

Read Full Post »

I noticed that yet another library value calculator has appeared on the scene. This one is offered by the National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NNLM) with the very best of intentions, I am sure. But, let me say that I am convinced that these calculators are a bad idea. Their underlying assumptions are weak [...]

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.