Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Library assessment’ Category

I want to share some information with you from a resource I mentioned last month. The resource is Edward Suchman’s 1967 book, Evaluative Research and the information is this diagram, which presents a basic model of evaluation:1 I share the diagram because it presents two ideas that don’t always percolate to the top of discussions [...]

Read Full Post »

A recent article in AL Direct entitled The Smartest Readers presents some simple library rankings based on that stalwart library measure, circulation per capita. Rankings like these are, at least to me, a reminder of a perennial conundrum concerning the meaning of per capita library measures. For more than a century librarianship has puzzled over [...]

Read Full Post »

Now that I am no longer distracted by the subject of last week’s entry I can get to the intended topic for my first 2011 blog entry. I should say, though, that I won’t be turning over any kind of new leaf for the new year. For now I’m sticking with the theme I’ve dwelt [...]

Read Full Post »

I had a different topic in mind for this, my first post of 2011. But an email I received from the friendly staff at WordPress changed my mind. What good news! WordPress congratulated me on my blog’s attainment of a rating of Awesome on their Blog Health-O-Meter™.  And I know they really approve of the [...]

Read Full Post »

During the question-and-answer part of a presentation I gave at the 2010 Library Assessment Conference in Baltimore last week, I couldn’t resist editorializing about how bad convenience sampling is. One audience member spoke up, saying she felt convenience samples are legitimate as long as findings are interpreted as describing only the respondents, themselves. Later on [...]

Read Full Post »

I have implied this in other entries in this blog, but I might as well say it outright: The library and information science profession needs to come to terms with the issue of standards for (i.e., rules of) evidence for performance, statistical, and advocacy research data. There, now I’ve said it. I recently read the [...]

Read Full Post »

In spite of their evolution over the last few decades, accelerated most recently due to the Googlization of information, public libraries have been amazingly impervious to change in the arena of performance measurement. I found the following observations about  library measures in the early history of American libraries: There is no branch of library economy [...]

Read Full Post »

I think I get it now.  I had thought the term assessment meant a systematic and appropriately rigorous measurement of a construct or phenomenon of interest, like program outcomes, community needs, service quality, and so on.  Only now have I come to understand that a self-assessment is a different animal altogether. Who would have thought [...]

Read Full Post »

I noticed that yet another library value calculator has appeared on the scene. This one is offered by the National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NNLM) with the very best of intentions, I am sure. But, let me say that I am convinced that these calculators are a bad idea. Their underlying assumptions are weak [...]

Read Full Post »

You may not want to spend time reading this blog post.  It’s rather long and drawn out and is likely to be dull.  And it gets kind of complicated. Besides, the graphics are sparse and uninteresting. Plus there’s no video. Instead, you might appreciate some other informational exper- ience better, one that happens also to [...]

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.